Use cases
Worked examples of the shapes the Bump Chart is built for — the data behind each one, the fields to bind, and the settings worth changing. Each is a starting point, not a rule.
Product and category sales rankings
Which products lead, which are climbing, and which quietly slipped off the podium. The commonest bump chart of all.
| Quarter | Product | Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 | Aurora | 412,000 |
| 2026 Q1 | Beacon | 388,500 |
| 2026 Q1 | Cascade | 301,900 |
| 2026 Q2 | Beacon | 402,100 |
| 2026 Q2 | Aurora | 355,000 |
| 2026 Q2 | Cascade | 344,700 |
| Field | Bind |
|---|---|
| Series | Product |
| Time | Quarter (or a date column at quarter level) |
| Value | Total Revenue measure |
| Tooltips | Units sold, margin %, growth vs prior quarter |
Settings: Top N 10, Smooth curves, rank numbers on, right-hand labels only, legend Top.
Put the growth measure in Tooltips rather than in Value. Ranking by revenue and explaining with growth is far more useful than ranking by growth, which tends to put your smallest products on top.
Sports league tables
Standings after each round — the case bump charts were invented for. Every team plays every round, so the chart is a clean grid with no gaps.
| Round | Team | Points |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Northfield | 27 |
| 12 | Kingsbridge | 25 |
| 12 | Ravenhill | 25 |
| 13 | Kingsbridge | 28 |
| 13 | Northfield | 27 |
| 13 | Ravenhill | 26 |
| Field | Bind |
|---|---|
| Series | Team |
| Time | Round (a whole-number column) |
| Value | Cumulative Points measure |
| Tooltips | Played, won, goal difference |
Settings: Linear curves (a round is a discrete event), Top N off for a small league, marker size 14 so the position numbers read clearly.
Points tables tie constantly. Add your competition's own tie-breaker into the measure — points plus goal difference divided by a large constant, say — so the chart orders teams the way the official table does. See Ties.
Market share and brand tracking
Where you sit against competitors over time, and when a rival overtook you.
| Month | Brand | Share |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-01 | Our brand | 0.184 |
| 2026-01 | Competitor A | 0.211 |
| 2026-01 | Competitor B | 0.147 |
| 2026-02 | Our brand | 0.203 |
| 2026-02 | Competitor A | 0.199 |
| Field | Bind |
|---|---|
| Series | Brand |
| Time | Month (date column, month level) |
| Value | Market Share % measure |
| Tooltips | Share %, share point change, category size |
Settings: Top N 8, Data Colors with your brand in a strong colour and every competitor in grey, opacity 80, labels both sides.
Share moves in fractions of a point, and a bump chart deliberately hides that. Keep the actual share in the tooltip, and pair the chart with a card or line chart showing the real numbers — the bump chart answers "who is ahead", the line chart answers "by how much".
Regional and store performance
A league table of branches, regions or reps, refreshed every month, with a slicer to drill into one area.
| Month | Region | Net Sales |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-01 | North | 1,204,000 |
| 2026-01 | South | 998,500 |
| 2026-01 | Midlands | 1,110,300 |
| Field | Bind |
|---|---|
| Series | Region (or Store) |
| Time | Month |
| Value | Net Sales measure |
| Tooltips | Target attainment, headcount, sales per head |
Settings: Top N 10 for stores, off for regions; Reverse Rank on if your audience reads a climb as improvement; legend Right.
Add a Region slicer and set its interaction to filter rather than highlight — then the chart re-ranks within the chosen region instead of dimming everything else. See Being filtered by other visuals.
Search terms, support topics and content popularity
What people ask about, week by week — a field of many series where only the leaders matter.
| Week | Topic | Tickets |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-W09 | Billing | 412 |
| 2026-W09 | Login issues | 388 |
| 2026-W09 | Exports | 97 |
| Field | Bind |
|---|---|
| Series | Topic |
| Time | Week (text column sorted by a week-number key) |
| Value | Ticket Count measure |
| Tooltips | Average resolution time, reopen rate |
Settings: Top N 10, line width 2, opacity 70, marker size 8, rank numbers off, right labels only.
This is the shape where series enter and leave the top constantly. Broken lines are the point — each break shows a topic dropping out of the top ten and coming back. Don't try to eliminate them.
Portfolio and asset class performance
Which asset classes, funds or strategies led each quarter — the classic "periodic table of returns", drawn as a race.
| Quarter | Asset class | Return |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 | Equities | 0.061 |
| 2026 Q1 | Bonds | 0.012 |
| 2026 Q1 | Real estate | 0.028 |
| Field | Bind |
|---|---|
| Series | Asset class |
| Time | Quarter |
| Value | Quarterly Return measure |
| Tooltips | Return %, volatility, weight in portfolio |
Settings: Top N off (the field is fixed and small), Linear curves, marker size 16 with rank numbers on, labels both sides, legend off.
Returns can be negative, which ranks perfectly well — the worst performer simply takes the bottom row. Keep the actual return in the tooltip so a reader can see whether rank 1 was a good quarter or merely the least bad one.
Choosing the right settings for your shape
| Your data | Top N | Curve | Markers | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 6 series, every period | Off | Smooth | Size 14, rank numbers on | Both sides |
| 6–15 series | 10 | Smooth | Size 10, rank numbers on | Right only |
| Many series, churning leaders | 10 | Linear | Size 8, rank numbers off | Right only |
| Discrete events (rounds, stages) | Off | Linear | Size 14, rank numbers on | Both sides |
| Small tile or dashboard | 5 | Smooth | Size 6, rank numbers off | Off, legend on |
When not to use a bump chart
A bump chart is the wrong tool when:
- The size of the gap is the story. Rank hides magnitude — use a line or bar chart.
- You have one or two series. There's no race; a line chart or a KPI card says it better.
- Your periods are irregular and the spacing matters. The axis is evenly spaced by design — see The axis is evenly spaced.
- Series appear and disappear constantly with no stable field. The picture becomes noise; rank the top few in a table instead.
Related
- Ranking & Top N — the mechanics behind every example above.
- Formatting reference — every setting with its default.